Writ petition listed; no petitioner's counsel present when case was called out. Court directed the matter to be listed in the next week as fresh. No substantive issue decided.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW
WRIT - C No. - 11670 of 2025
Sheela Devi
.....Petitioner(s)
Versus
State Of U.P. Thru. Commissioner And Secy., Board Of Revenue, Lko. And Others
| oar evenue, o. n | ers | .....Resp | ondent(s) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Counsel for Petitioner(s) | : Janendra Kumar Kumar Verma |
Verma, | Deepak |
| Counsel for Respondent(s) | : C.S.C. |
Court No. - 2
HON'BLE MRS. SANGEETA CHANDRA, J. HON'BLE AMITABH KUMAR RAI, J.
Case called out.
None appears on behalf of the petitioner.
List in the next week as fresh.
(Amitabh Kumar Rai,J.) (Mrs. Sangeeta Chandra,J.) December 8, 2025
mks
Digitally signed by :- MANISH SAXENA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Sheela Devi
State of U.P. thru. Commissioner and Secy., Board of Revenue, Lko.
Sangeeta Chandra
Amitabh Kumar Rai
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
