Writ petition dismissed in default of appearance as neither petitioners nor counsel appeared and no adjournment was requested upon list revision.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:3426
Court No. - 19
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 1006845 of 2012
Petitioner :- Ravindra Kumar Srivastava And Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru Secy. Deptt. Of Madhyamik Shikha And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ratnesh Chandra Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,H.N.Tiwari
Hon'ble Manish Mathur,J.
List has been revised.
None appears on behalf of petitioners nor any request for adjournment has been made.
In view of aforesaid, the petition is dismissed in default of appearance.
Order Date :- 20.1.2025 Satish
Digitally signed by :- SATISH KUMAR BHARATI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Ravindra Kumar Srivastava And Others
State Of U.P. Thru Secy. Deptt. Of Madhyamik Shikha
Manish Mathur
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
