Writ petition dismissed after counsel reported that the sole petitioner had died and no one had since approached the office; dismissal for want of instructions.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW
WRIT - C No. - 1005217 of 2005
Dev Raj Singh Objection Filed
.....Petitioner(s)
Versus
D.J. Unnao And 2 Ors.
.....Respondent(s)
| Counsel for Petitioner(s) | : Anoop Srivastava Ii |
|---|---|
| Counsel for Respondent(s) | : C.S.C., Sunder Lal |
Court No. - 6
HON'BLE JASPREET SINGH, J.
Sri Jai Shukla, learned counsel appearing under the authority of Sri Anoop Srivastava-II, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the sole petitioner has died and since then no one contacted the office of the learned counsel for the petitioner.
Accordingly, the present petition is dismissed for want of instructions. Consigned to records.
(Jaspreet Singh,J.)
October 8, 2025
Asheesh
Digitally signed by :- ASHEESH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Dev Raj Singh Objection Filed
D.J. Unnao
Jaspreet Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
