Writ petition of 1998 dismissed for want of prosecution as no one appeared for the petitioner; any earlier interim order stood discharged.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:27712
Court No. - 8 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 1001978 of 1998
Petitioner :- Shree Thakur Radhakrishanji Maharaj Virajman Thakurdwara Respondent :- Vii Addl. District Judge Lucknow Counsel for Petitioner :- Ved Prakesh,Ajai Kumar Jaiswal,Anurag Srivastava Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Pankaj Kumar,Piyush Chandra Agarwal
Hon'ble Jaspreet Singh,J.
This petition is of the year 1998.
None appears on behalf of the petitioner.
Shri P.C. Agarwal, learned counsel for respondent no.3 is present.
Since there is none to press this petition on behalf of the petitioner, it is accordingly dismissed for want of prosecution.
Interim order granted earlier, if any, shall stand discharged.
Consigned to record.
Order Date :- 12.5.2025
Shukla
Digitally signed by :- ASHUTOSH KUMAR SHUKLA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Shree Thakur Radhakrishanji Maharaj Virajman Thakurdwara
Vii Addl. District Judge Lucknow
Jaspreet Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
