Disposed¶6

Shiv Kumar v. State of U.P. and 3 Others

Allahabad HC10 Feb 2025WRIB/4982/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

WRIT-B 4982 of 2024; Shiv Kumar; State Of U.P. And 3 Others; J.J. Munir; order date 15.1.2025; Consolidation Officer (Antim Abhilekh), Padrauna, District Kushinagar; Case No. 17 II Shiv Kumar v. Deep and another; Rule 109 of the U.P. Consolidation of Holdings Rules, 1954; lingering proceedings / pendency report; Registrar (Compliance); ten days; Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kushinagar; 48 hours communication; laid fresh on 06.02.2025; Brahmanand Singh; Raj Kishore Yadav; C.S.C.; interim compliance order

What did the court decide?

No substantive relief conferred at this stage; interim directions issued for a pendency report by the Consolidation Officer and relisting of the petition as fresh on 06.02.2025. ¶6

Shiv Kumar Vs State of U.P. and 3 Others — Allahabad HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

No substantive relief conferred at this stage; interim directions issued for a pendency report by the Consolidation Officer and relisting of the petition as fresh on 06.02.2025.

¶6

Issue for consideration

Why proceedings of Case No. 17 II, Shiv Kumar v. Deep and another, under Rule 109 of the U.P. Consolidation of Holdings Rules, 1954, before the Consolidation Officer (Antim Abhilekh), Padrauna, District Kushinagar, are lingering on.

¶5

Court's answer

The Consolidation Officer (Antim Abhilekh), Padrauna, District Kushinagar must submit a report explaining why proceedings of Case No. 17 II, Shiv Kumar v. Deep and another, under Rule 109 of the U.P. Consolidation of Holdings Rules, 1954, are lingering on.

¶5

Ratio / Principle

The delay-explanation report is due to this Court through the Registrar (Compliance) within ten days and, in all events, by the date scheduled.

¶5

Key takeaways

The writ petition is to be laid as fresh on 06.02.2025 together with the report received from the Consolidation Officer (Antim Abhilekh), Padrauna, District Kushinagar.ratio¶6
The order is to be communicated to the Consolidation Officer (Antim Abhilekh), Padrauna, District Kushinagar through the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kushinagar by the Registrar (Compliance) within 48 hours.ratio¶7

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

Writ-B (No. 4982 of 2024), High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, order dated 15.1.2025 (Hon'ble J.J. Munir, J.): the Court directed the Consolidation Officer (Antim Abhilekh), Padrauna, District Kushinagar to submit, through the Registrar (Compliance) within ten days and in all events by the scheduled date, a report explaining why proceedings of Case No. 17 II, Shiv Kumar v. Deep and another, under Rule 109 of the U.P. Consolidation of Holdings Rules, 1954, are lingering on; the order was to be conveyed through the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kushinagar within 48 hours; the petition was laid as fresh on 06.02.2025 to be heard with the report. Interim compliance/pendency order only: no precedent cited, no substantive adjudication, no quantum.

Shiv Kumar v. State of U.P. and 3 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Shiv Kumar v. State of U.P. and 3 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases