Writ petition filed in relation to a consolidation-of-holdings matter. After the Consolidation Officer submitted the required report and judgment, no further orders were needed; petition consigned to record with petitioner advised to seek remedies if aggrieved.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 49
Case :- WRIT - B No. - 333 of 2025
Petitioner :- Shiv Kumar Respondent :- State of U.P. and others Counsel for Petitioner :- Arvind Kumar Srivastava,Bhaju Ram Pprasad Sharma Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Sudhir Bharti
Hon'ble J.J. Munir,J.
1. In compliance with the orders dated 27.01.2025, the Consolidation Officer, Final Records, Farendra, Maharajganj has submitted a report dated 01.03.2025, enclosing therewith a copy of the judgment and order of the same date, deciding Case No. RST/0043/2024 (Computerized Case No. 202454054752040043), Ramnaresh and others v. Rampyari, under Section 12 of the Uttar Pradesh Consolidation of Holdings Act, 1953.
2. In this view of aforesaid event, no further orders are required to be made on this petition. It is, accordingly, consigned to record with the remark that in case the petitioner is aggrieved by the order of the Consolidation Officer, it will be open to him to seek such remedies, as advised.
Order Date :- 4.3.2025 I. Batabyal
(J.J. Munir, J.)
Digitally signed by :- ISHAN BATABYAL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 issue framed by the court
No substantive issue decided; petition consigned to record after Consolidation Officer's compliance report.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Shiv Kumar
State of U.P.
J.J. Munir
As recorded by the court registry
4 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
