Jitendra Singh v. State of U.P. Thru. Secy. Revenue, Lko. and 4 Others
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner challenged a consolidation notification and sought relief to reconsider it or direct authorities to decide his representation. The petitioner withdrew the quashing claim, and the court directed the authority to decide his representation expeditiously under Rule 17 of the 1954 Rules.
What did the court decide?
Petitioner directed to move a fresh representation; Authority directed to consider and decide the same expeditiously.