Disposed¶14

Shahna Parveen and Another v. State of U.P. and 5 Others

Allahabad HC13 May 2025WRIB/1841/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Writ-B No. 1841 of 2025; Shahna Parveen v. State of U.P.; Allahabad High Court; Chandra Kumar Rai, J.; order dated 19.5.2025; Section 12 U.P.C.H. Act; consolidation revisional order; sale deed 21.08.2010 by Kallu; sale deed by Tahira Begum in favour of Saroj Devi; Kallu witness; counter affidavit six weeks; rejoinder affidavit two weeks; interim relief rejected; next date 23.07.2025.

What did the court decide?

Interim order only: application for interim relief rejected; respondent Nos.5 & 6 to file counter affidavit within six weeks, petitioners to file rejoinder affidavit within two weeks thereafter; matter listed on 23.07.2025. Writ petition remains pending, no final relief decided. ¶14

Shahna Parveen and Another vs State of U.P. and 5 Others — Allahabad HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

¶14

Issue for consideration

Whether the revisional order of the consolidation authorities under Section 12 of the U.P.C.H. Act, deciding the title dispute between the petitioners (claiming under sale deed dated 21.08.2010 executed by Kallu) and the private respondents (claiming under sale deed executed by Tahira Begum in favour of Saroj Devi), was passed arbitrarily and without considering the petitioners' case in accordance with law

¶6

Ratio / Principle

Matter requires consideration.

¶8

Key takeaways

Respondent Nos.5 & 6 directed to file counter affidavit within six weeks; petitioners to file rejoinder affidavit within two weeks thereafter; matter to be listed on 23.07.2025.ratio¶9
No case for grant of interim order is made out; the application for interim relief (stay) is rejected.ratio¶14

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

Allahabad High Court (Chandra Kumar Rai, J.), Writ-B No. 1841 of 2025, Shahna Parveen & Anr. v. State of U.P. & 5 Ors., order dated 19.5.2025: Petitioners, claiming under a sale deed executed on 21.08.2010 by Kallu, challenged a revisional order of the consolidation authorities said to have decided the dispute under Section 12 of the U.P.C.H. Act as arbitrary and contrary to law; private respondents claimed under a sale deed executed by Tahira Begum in favour of Saroj Devi, with Kallu (husband of Tahira Begum) as witness. The Court held that the matter requires consideration, directed respondent Nos.5 & 6 to file counter affidavit within six weeks and the petitioners to file rejoinder affidavit within two weeks thereafter, listed the matter on 23.07.2025, and rejected the stay application, finding no case for grant of interim order was made out. No merits adjudication; no precedent cited.

Shahna Parveen and Another v. State of U.P. and 5 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Shahna Parveen and Another v. State of U.P. and 5 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Santosh Kumar Singh vs Sri Mahendra Kumar, Kul Sachiv, Veer Bahadur Singh Purvanchal

Rizwan and 4 Others vs State of U.P. and 2 Others

Mohammad Aajam vs State of Up and 2 Others

Smt. Sandhya Rani vs Rajendra Kumar

Sachin Rajput Alias Chanki Rajput vs State of U.P. and 3 Others

Lachhiman and 3 Others vs State of Uttar Pradesh and 10 Others