Mohammad Abid v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Transport Lko. and 3 Others
Case brief
What is this about?
Allahabad High Court (Lucknow Bench), WRIT - A No. 9803 of 2025, Mohammad Abid v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Transport Lko. and 3 Others, decided August 29, 2025 by Hon'ble Abdul Moin, J. Subject: post-retiral dues of a retired employee (leave encashment; ten months' confiscated arrears; two increments' arrears). Disposed of on consent by time-bound representation direction to respondent No.3 (ten days to file; eight weeks to decide by reasoned and speaking order); Court expressly did not enter merits; no costs discussed; no statute or precedent cited. Keywords: service law, retiral/pensionary benefits, leave encashment, representation, time-bound disposal, mandamus-type direction.
What did the court decide?
With consent of counsel, writ petition disposed of: if the petitioner submits a representation before respondent No.3 within ten days, respondent No.3 to endeavour to decide it by a reasoned and speaking order within eight weeks of receipt of a certified copy of the order along with the representation; no adjudication on merits.