Disposed¶5

Patiraj Singh v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Home Lko. and 4 Others

Allahabad HC25 Aug 2025WRIA/9450/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

ACP arrears; dearness allowance; arrears of promotional benefit; arrears of salary; 9% interest per annum; fresh representation; respondent no.3 Deputy Director Dudhwa Tiger Reserve (printed 'Reseve'), Lakhimpur Kheri; eight weeks timeline; innocuous prayer; disposed without merits; Patiraj Singh v. State of U.P.; D.K. Singh Somvanshi for petitioner; C.S.C. for respondents; Manish Mathur J.; Allahabad High Court Lucknow Bench; 2025:AHC-LKO:49730.

What did the court decide?

Liberty to file a fresh representation before respondent no.3 (Deputy Director of Dudhwa Tiger Reseve, Lakhimpur Kheri), who is directed to consider and decide it expeditiously within eight weeks from production of a certified copy of the order; no monetary relief adjudicated. ¶5

Patiraj Singh Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Home Lko. and 4 Others — Allahabad HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

¶5

Issue for consideration

Whether the authorities concerned should be directed to pay the petitioner his remaining ACP, dearness allowance, and arrears of promotional benefit including arrears of salary, along with 9% interest per annum.

¶2

Court's answer

Liberty is granted to the petitioner to file a fresh representation before respondent no.3, i.e., the Deputy Director of Dudhwa Tiger Reseve, Lakhimpur Kheri.

¶4

Ratio / Principle

Respondent no.3 shall consider and decide the fresh representation expeditiously, within a period of eight weeks from the date a certified copy of this order is produced before him.

¶4

Key takeaways

The court expressly declined to enter into the merits of the case while passing the above direction ('without going into the merits of the case'); accordingly no finding was rendered on the petitioner's substantive entitlement to ACP/dearness allowance/arrears or the claimed 9% interest.obiter¶4

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

Writ petition (WRIT - A No. - 9450 of 2025), Court No. 8, High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench; Hon'ble Manish Mathur, J.; order dated 25.8.2025; Neutral Citation 2025:AHC-LKO:49730. Petitioner Patiraj Singh sought a direction to the authorities concerned for payment of remaining ACP, dearness allowance, and arrears of promotional benefit including arrears of salary, with 9% interest per annum. Having already submitted a representation, he sought liberty to file a fresh one. Without going into the merits, the court disposed of the petition, granting liberty to file a fresh representation before respondent no.3, the Deputy Director of Dudhwa Tiger Reseve [sic], Lakhimpur Kheri, who was directed to consider and decide the same expeditiously within eight weeks from the date a certified copy of the order is produced before him. No substantive finding was recorded on the monetary claims.

Patiraj Singh v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Home Lko. and 4 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Patiraj Singh v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Home Lko. and 4 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Vijendra Kumar Vs State of U.P. Thru. Its Addl. Chief Secy. Deptt. of Agriculture Lko. and 2 Others

Durga Prasad Shukla and 2 Others Vs State of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Deptt. Finance Lko. and 3 Others

Ram Singh and 2 Others Vs State of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Deptt. of Finance Lko. and 5 Others

Ram Bharose Sharma and 69 Others Vs State of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Deptt. of Finance Lko and 22 Others

Abhiram Prasad Verma Alias Aviram Prasad Verma Vs State of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Minor Irrigation and Ground Water Deptt. Lko and Another

Arjun Vs State of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Deptt. of Finance Lko and 4 Others