Disposed¶9
Ajay Kumar Srivastava v. State of U.P. and 2 Others
Allahabad HCWRIA/9313/2024
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Allahabad High Court; WRIT - A No. 9313 of 2024; Ajay Kumar Srivastava v. State of U.P.; writ petition disposed of as nothing remained for adjudication after representation decided in petitioner's favour; State-respondents did not dispute; single bench of Chandra Dhari Singh, J.; order dated 11.8.2025; counsel Utkarsh Pandey; C.S.C. for respondents; neutral citation 2025:AHC:135938.
What did the court decide?
The Court held that no useful purpose would be served in keeping the matter pending for further adjudication, since the petitioner's representation had already been decided in his favour and the State-respondents did not dispute this; accordingly, the writ petition was disposed of. ¶8