Disposed¶4

Rajnarayan Singh and Another v. State of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Deptt. of Finance U.P. Lko. and 5 Others

Allahabad HC11 Aug 2025WRIA/8967/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

commutation of pension; restoration of commuted pension; 15-year restoration period; U.P. Civil Pension (Commutation) Rules 1941; Government Orders dated 23.07.1987, 06.12.1990, 08.12.2008; benefit of earlier judgment extended; Dr. Om Prakash Srivastava And Others v. State Of U.P.; Writ - A No. 5617 of 2024 decided 28.05.2025; pensioner retiral benefits; service and pension law; parity disposal; Allahabad High Court Lucknow Bench; Manish Mathur J.; neutral citation 2025:AHC-LKO:46729

What did the court decide?

Writ petition disposed of finally; petitioners declared entitled to the benefit of the judgment rendered in WRIT - A No. - 5617 of 2024 (Dr. Om Prakash Srivastava And Others v. State Of U.P.) and other connected matters decided on 28.05.2025. ¶4

Rajnarayan Singh and Another Vs State of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Deptt. of Finance U.P. Lko. and 5 Others — Allahabad HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

¶4

Issue for consideration

Whether petitioners are entitled to restoration of their commuted pension after expiry of 10 years 11 months or at best 11 years, instead of the 15-year restoration period prescribed in the U.P. Civil Pension (Commutation) Rules 1941 as amended by the Government Orders dated 23.07.1987, 06.12.1990 and 08.12.2008.

¶2

Court's answer

The writ petition is disposed of finally, providing that the petitioners of this writ petition shall also be entitled to the benefit of the judgment rendered in Writ - A No. - 5617 of 2024 (Dr. Om Prakash Srivastava And Others v. State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Deptt. Of Finance Lko 3 Others) and other connected matters decided on 28.05.2025, counsel for both sides having admitted that the petitioners' case is squarely covered by that judgment.

¶4

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

Allahabad High Court, Lucknow Bench, Court No. 8 (Neutral Citation No. 2025:AHC-LKO:46729), Writ - A No. 8967 of 2025, Hon'ble Manish Mathur, J., Order dated 11.8.2025. Rajnarayan Singh and another challenged the provision prescribing a restoration period of 15 years in the U.P. Civil Pension (Commutation) Rules 1941 as amended by Government Orders dated 23.07.1987, 06.12.1990 and 08.12.2008, seeking restoration of the commuted pension after expiry of 10 years 11 months or at best 11 years. Learned counsel for the parties admitted that the petitioners' case was squarely covered by this Court's judgment in Writ - A No. - 5617 of 2024 (Dr. Om Prakash Srivastava And Others v. State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Deptt. Of Finance Lko 3 Others) and other connected matters decided on 28.05.2025. On that basis, the writ petition was disposed of finally, the petitioners being extended the benefit of that judgment.

Rajnarayan Singh and Another v. State of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Deptt. of Finance U.P. Lko. and 5 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rajnarayan Singh and Another v. State of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Deptt. of Finance U.P. Lko. and 5 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Ijhar Ahmad Kha Pno 952110765 Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Police Deptt. Lko. and 3 Others

Har Prasad Ahirwar Vs State of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Deptt. of Home Lko. and 4 Others

Shyam Bali Yadav Vs State of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Deptt. of Home Lko. and 3 Others

Vishram Yadav vs State of U.P. Thru. Secy. Forest Deptt. Lko. and Another

Ramsajivan vs State of U.P. Thru. Secy. Forest Deptt. Lko and Another

Chhote Lal vs State of U.P. Thru. Secy. Forest Deptt. Lko and Another