Anuj Kumar Panday v. State of U.P. Thru. Secy. Transport Lko and 5 Others
Case brief
What is this about?
Contractual appointment; termination of services pursuant to agreement of contract; lapse of more than three years since impugned termination order; no reason to interfere; writ petition dismissed; petitioner Anuj Kumar Panday v. State of U.P. (Transport); High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench, Court No. 4; sole judge Abdul Moin; neutral citation 2025:AHC-LKO:48114; no statutes or precedent cases cited.
What did the court decide?
Since the petitioner's services were contractual and were terminated in pursuance of the agreement of contract, the Court did not find any reason to interfere with the impugned termination order. ¶7