Disposed¶11

Ranjana Pandey v. State of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Deptt. of Basic Education Lko. and 5 Others

Writ – A (Allahabad High Court, Lucknow Bench, Abdul Moin, J.)

Allahabad HC9 Jul 2025WRIA/7342/2025

Download

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Assistant Teacher transfer on family circumstances; writ of mandamus for consideration of transfer to Lucknow or nearby district; State of U.P. Basic Education Department; representation before respondent no.3 to be decided by reasoned and speaking order within six weeks; disposal without entering merits; WRIT - A No. 7342 of 2025; Abdul Moin, J.; decided 9.7.2025; neutral citation 2025:AHC-LKO:38823.

What did the court decide?

Liberty to the petitioner to submit a representation before respondent no.3 within two weeks; respondent no.3 to decide it by a reasoned and speaking order within six weeks of receipt of a certified copy of the order along with the representation. ¶11

Ranjana Pandey Vs State of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Deptt. of Basic Education Lko. and 5 Others — Allahabad HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:38823

¶2

Court No. - 5

¶3

Case :- WRIT - A No. - 7342 of 2025

¶4

Petitioner :- Ranjana Pandey Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Deptt. Of Basic Education Lko. And 5 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Shreyash Agrawal,Kamini Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Pradeep Tiwari,Ran Vijay Singh,Rishabh Tripathi

¶5

Hon'ble Abdul Moin,J.

¶6

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for the respondents No.1 to 3, Shri Pradeep Tiwari, learned counsel appearing for respondent No.4, Shri Arun Singh holding brief of Shri Rishabh Tripathi, learned counsel appearing for respondent No.5 and Shri Ran Vijay Singh, learned counsel appearing for respondent No.6.

¶7

With the consent of learned counsel appearing for the contesting parties, the writ petition is finally being disposed of.

¶8

Instant petition has been filed by an Assistant Teacher praying for a writ of mandamus for a direction to respondents No.2 & 3 to consider the petitioner for transfer to Lucknow or a nearby district on the ground of her family circumstances.

¶9

After arguing at some length, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that with regard to the relief sought in the writ petition, the petitioner may be permitted to submit a representation before the respondent no.6 which may be directed to be decided within a fixed time frame to which learned counsels for the respondents have no objection.

¶10

In view of the above, it is provided that in case the petitioner submits a representation within two weeks from today before the respondent no.3 then the respondent no.3 shall endevour to decide the same by means of a reasoned and speaking order within a further period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order along with representation.

¶11

With the aforesaid direction, writ petition is disposed of.

¶12

It is made clear that this Court has not gone into the merits of the claim set forth by the petitioner.

¶13

Order Date :- 9.7.2025 prateek

¶14

Digitally signed by :- PRATEEK ARORA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Ranjana Pandey v. State of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Deptt. of Basic Education Lko. and 5 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ranjana Pandey v. State of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Deptt. of Basic Education Lko. and 5 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Rajendra Prasad Pathak Vs U.O.I. Thru. Secy. Deptt. of Telecommunications Ministry of Communications New Delhi and 2 Others

Nagendra Prasad Mishra Vs Union of India Thru. Secy. Deptt. Telecommunications Ministry Commmunications and 2 Others

Om Prakash Singh Vs Union of India Thru. Secy. Mini. of Comm. New Delhi and 2 Others

Ramendra Kumar Singh Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Panchayat Raj Lko. U.P. and 2 Others

Ram Pher Yadav Vs State of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Urban Development Vidhan Sabha Marg Lko. and 3 Others

Chhote Lal Kantak and 5 Others Vs State of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Deptt. of Finance Lko. and 5 Others