Disposed¶12

Satish Kumar v. State of U.P. and Another

Allahabad HC7 Feb 2025WRIA/712/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Satish Kumar v. State of U.P. and Another; WRIT - A No. - 712 of 2025; High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Court No. 4; Ajit Kumar, J.; Order Date 7.2.2025; Neutral Citation 2025:AHC:21126; Article 226 mandamus; ACP financial year 2023, 2024-2025; pay scale November 2022 to December 2023; bonus and arrears 2023-2024, 2024-205; representation dated 27th December 2024 undecided; direction to decide representation within three months of certified copy; reasoned and speaking order; C.S.C.; Krishna Kant Dubey; Santosh Kumar Dubey; time-bound disposal.

What did the court decide?

Direction to respondent No. 2 to look into and consider the petitioner's representation dated 27 December 2024 and decide it as expeditiously as possible, preferably within three months from production of certified copy of the order, by a reasoned and speaking order.

Satish Kumar vs State of U.P. and Another — Writ and Judicial Review | Allahabad HC (2025)

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

¶12

Issue for consideration

Whether the petitioner should be granted, via mandamus against respondent No. 2, his ACP for financial year 2023 and 2024-2025, pay scale from November 2022 to December 2023, and bonus and arrears for the years 2023-2024 and 2024-205. +1 more

¶9

Ratio / Principle

This petition stands disposed of with a direction to respondent No. 2 to look into and consider the petitioner's representation dated 27th December, 2024 and decide the same.

¶12

Key takeaways

The representation is to be decided as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of three months from the date of production of certified copy of this order.ratio¶12
The order to be passed by the authority concerned shall be a reasoned and speaking one.obiter¶13

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

High Court of Judicature at Allahabad (Court No. 4), Hon'ble Ajit Kumar, J. — Order dated 7.2.2025 in WRIT - A No. - 712 of 2025 (Satish Kumar v. State of U.P. and Another; Neutral Citation 2025:AHC:21126). Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution praying for mandamus directing respondent No. 2 to provide the petitioner's ACP for financial year 2023 and 2024-2025, pay scale from November 2022 to December 2023, and bonus and arrears for 2023-2024 and '2024-205' [sic]; the petitioner's representation dated 27th December, 2024 on these claims remained undecided before respondent No. 2. Learned Standing Counsel raised no objection to time-bound disposal. The Court disposed of the petition, directing respondent No. 2 to look into and consider the representation and decide it as expeditiously as possible, preferably within three months from the date of production of certified copy of the order, and observed that the order so passed shall be a reasoned and speaking one. No precedent engaged; no monetary quantum adjudicated; substantive entitlement left to the authority's decision on the representation.

Satish Kumar v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Satish Kumar v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Awadhesh Kumar Diwedi vs State of U.P. and 4 Others

Vipul Tiwari and 12 Others vs State of U.P. and 6 Others

Gulnaz vs State of U.P. and 2 Others

Braj Bhushan Rai and 10 Othes vs State of U.P. and 6 Others

Rampal Singh and 6 Others vs State of U.P. and 7 Others

Karan Dexit vs State of U.P. and 2 Others