Skip to content

The research platform for Indian law — judgements, legislation and the citations between them. Free to search, with the original document behind every result.

A product of LawSathi.

Research

Search Legislation Research tools

Browse

Courts Case types Topics Most-cited judgements Sources

LawSathi

Practice platform Blog

© 2026 LawSathiTerms PrivacyResearch aid, not the official record.

Gokaran Prasad Vs State of U.P. and Others — Allahabad HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

Home
Allahabad HC
2025
Gokaran Prasad Vs State of U.P. and OthersGokaran Prasad v. State of U.P. and Others

Dismissed¶9

Gokaran Prasad v. State of U.P. and Others

Allahabad HC15 Jul 2025WRIA/7101/1996

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Gokaran Prasad v. State of U.P. and Others | WRIT - A No. - 7101 of 1996 | High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench | Court No. 18 | Manish Mathur, J. | Neutral Citation No. 2025:AHC-LKO:40378 | Order dated 15.7.2025 | Petition dismissed for want of prosecution (petitioner absent; State Counsel C.S.C. for opposite party nos. 1 to 4 and 6) | Interim order, if any, vacated.

What did the court decide?

As no one appeared on behalf of the petitioner, the writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. ¶9

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

Dismissed

Ratio / Principle

As no one appeared on behalf of the petitioner, the writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.

Key takeaways

Any interim order, if existing, stands vacated upon dismissal.ratio¶10

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

WRIT - A No. 7101 of 1996 (petitioner Gokaran Prasad v. State of U.P. and Others), a writ petition pertaining to the year 1996 before the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench, Court No. 18 (single judge bench of Hon'ble Manish Mathur, J.), was dismissed for want of prosecution on 15.7.2025 (Neutral Citation No. 2025:AHC-LKO:40378), as no one appeared on behalf of the petitioner while learned State Counsel (C.S.C.) appeared on behalf of opposite party nos. 1 to 4 and 6; any interim order, if any, stood vacated.

A

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:40378

Court No. - 18

Case :- WRIT - A No. - 7101 of 1996

Petitioner :- Gokaran Prasad Respondent :- State of U.P. and Others Counsel for Petitioner :- R.G. Misra Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.

Hon'ble Manish Mathur,J.

List has been revised.

Petition pertains to year 1996.

No one has put in appearance on behalf of petitioner while learned State Counsel has put in appearance on behalf of opposite party nos. 1 to 4 and 6.

In view thereof, petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.

Interim order, if any, stands vacated.

Order Date :- 15.7.2025 Virendra

Digitally signed by :- VIRENDRA KUMAR GUPTA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Procedural history

How this case reached the court

AI extract

Prior proceeding
List was revised before consideration of the matter.¶6
Prior proceeding
Writ petition pertains to the year 1996.¶7
Prior proceeding
On the day of the order, no representative appeared for the petitioner; learned State Counsel appeared for opposite party nos. 1 to 4 and 6.¶8

Parties & counsel

AI extract

petitioner
Gokaran Prasad¶4
R.G. Misra
respondent
State of U.P. and Others¶4
C.S.C.

Coram

AI extract

Manish Mathurauthor¶5

Case details

As recorded by the court registry

Court: Allahabad HC
Decided on: 15 Jul 2025 · July
Registered: 13 Nov 1996
Case no.: WRIA/7101/1996
CNR: UPHC020193281996
Bench: Manish Mathur
Disposal: Dismiss other than merit(DD/Non Prosec./Abated)
Case type: WRIT - A

Similar cases

Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court

Finding judgements on the same questions…

More from Manish Mathur

Amita Verma Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin.Secy. Deptt. of Social Welfare and 2 Others
14 Jul 2025
Savita Devi Vs State of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Bal Vikas Seva Evam Pushtahar U.P. Lko. and 4 Others
14 Jul 2025
Dilip Saxena and 4 Others Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. General Administration Lko. and 2 Others
14 Jul 2025
Juber Ahmad Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. / Addl. Chief Secy. Deptt. of Panchayat Raj Lko and 3 Others
15 Jul 2025
Smt. Usha Yadav Vs State of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Deptt. Panchayati Raj Deptt. Govt. of U.P. and 3 Others
15 Jul 2025
Kalavati Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Finance Govt. Lko and 2 Others
15 Jul 2025

Cite this judgement

Gokaran Prasad v. State of U.P. and Others, WRIA/7101/1996 (ALL), decided on 15 July 2025.

The Allahabad High Court publishes no neutral citation for this judgement — cite it by case number and date of decision.

Procedural history3

List was revised before consideration of the matter.
Writ petition pertains to the year 1996.

View full history

Bench / Coram

Manish Mathur

Parties & counsel