Disposed¶10

Gyan Chandra v. State of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Deptt. Energy Lko. and 3 Others

Allahabad HC2 Jul 2025WRIA/6969/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Writ petition against transfer order disposed of with direction to petitioner to file representation before competent authority within one week; authority to decide in three weeks; protection from coercive action pending decision.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner directed to submit representation before competent authority within one week; authority to decide within three weeks; no coercive action pending disposal. ¶10

Gyan Chandra Vs State of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Deptt. Energy Lko. and 3 Others — Allahabad HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:37131

¶2

Court No. - 5

¶3

Case :- WRIT - A No. - 6969 of 2025

¶4

Petitioner :- Gyan Chandra Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Deptt. Energy Lko. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Prabhat Kumar Mishra,Adarsh Tripathi,Pradeep Kumar Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Ran Vijay Singh

¶5

Hon'ble Abdul Moin,J.

¶6

Heard.

¶7

With the consent of learned counsels appearing for the contesting parties, the writ petition is being finally decided.

¶8

Under challenge is transfer order dated 31.05.2025 (wrongly typed as 31.05.2024 in the prayer clause), a copy of which is annexure no.1 to the petition, so far as it pertains to the petitioner, by which the petitioner has been transferred from district Akbarpur to Barabanki.

¶9

Learned counsel for petitioner has raised various grounds to challenge the impugned transfer order, however the Court is of the view that the said grounds fall in the realm of the grounds to be considered by the respondents at the first instance.

¶10

Accordingly, without entering into the merits of the case, the present petition is disposed of leaving it open to the petitioner to submit a comprehensive representation against the impugned transfer order dated 31.05.2025 before the competent authority i.e. Chief Engineer, Madhyanchal Vidyut Vitran Nigam Limited, Ayodhya / respondent no. 4 within a period of one week from today.

¶11

In case such a representation is made, respondent no. 4 shall proceed to decide the same in accordance with law considering the grounds taken by the petitioner in the representation, which would be decided within a period of three weeks from the date of receipt of the representation alongwith certified copy of this order.

¶12

Till disposal of representation, no coercive action shall be taken by the respondents against the petitioner in pursuance of the impugned transfer order.

¶13

It is made clear that if the petitioner does not submit his representation within the time specified, then the benefit of this order shall not be available to him.

¶14

Order Date :- 2.7.2025 A. Katiyar

¶15

Digitally signed by :- AMIT KATIYAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Gyan Chandra v. State of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Deptt. Energy Lko. and 3 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Gyan Chandra v. State of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Deptt. Energy Lko. and 3 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Lalit Kumar Jain Vs United India Insureence Compnay Ltd.through Chairman

Smt. Shabnam Malik Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Energy Up Civil Sectt. Lko. and 2 Others

Ram Kumar Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Sugar Industries U.P. Govt. Lko. and 3 Others

Shyam Sundar and Another vs State of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy./ Prin. Secy., Pichharavarg Kalyan Vibhag Lko. and 2 Others

Manoj Kumar vs State of U.P. Thru. Collector, Faizabad and Others

Shiva Murati vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Urban Development U.P. Lko. and 3 Others