Geeta v. State of U.P. and 2 Others
Case brief
What is this about?
Geeta v. State of U.P. and 2 Others; WRIT - A No. 6967 of 2025; High Court of Judicature at Allahabad; Ajay Bhanot, J.; order dated 26.5.2025; Neutral Citation 2025:AHC:89290. Petitioner superannuated on 31.08.2024 while working as safai karmchari in Nagar Nigam, Kanpur Nagar; representation for ACP, pension, gratuity, leave encashment, group insurance and arrears undecided; writ petition finally disposed of with a three-month direction to respondent no.2 to decide the representation in accordance with law; merits not adjudicated; no statutes or precedents cited.
What did the court decide?
Direction to respondent no.2 to decide the petitioner's representation regarding ACP, pension, gratuity, leave encashment, group insurance and arrears in accordance with law within three months of receipt of a certified copy of the order, along with a fresh copy of the representation.