Interim order in a service matter where a forest department worker alleged oral termination despite an earlier court-directed decision on his representation. The bench granted time for a counter affidavit and directed that, while juniors or similarly situated persons work, the petitioner also be allowed to work.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 18 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 6291 of 2025 Petitioner :- Ram Bodh Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Forest Lko. And 5 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Hanumant Lal Yadav,Shailendra Singh Chauhan Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Karunesh Singh Pawar,J.
Order Date :- 29.5.2025
Madhu D.R/P.S
Digitally signed by :- MADHU KUMARI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Ram Bodh
State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Forest Lko.
Karunesh Singh Pawar
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
