Disposed¶11

Smt Keshar v. State of U.P. and 2 Others

Allahabad HC7 May 2025WRIA/6153/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Assured Career Progression (A.C.P.) benefits; group insurance; arrears; post-retiral/post-retirement dues; representation undecided; time-bound decision (three months); certified copy of order; retired 2023; Health Department U.P.; Kanpur Nagar Nigam; State of U.P.; WRIT - A No. 6153 of 2025; Allahabad High Court; Ajay Bhanot J.; 7.5.2025; Neutral Citation 2025:AHC:73315.

What did the court decide?

Direction to the respondent authority to decide the petitioner's representation regarding grant of Assured Career Progression (A.C.P.), group insurance and other benefits in accordance with law within three months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of the order along with a fresh copy of the representation. ¶11

Smt Keshar vs State of U.P. and 2 Others — Allahabad HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

¶11

Issue for consideration

Whether the respondent authority can be directed to decide the petitioner's representation seeking grant of Assured Career Progression (A.C.P.) benefits, group insurance and other entitlements within a stipulated period of time.

¶8

Court's answer

Without going into the merits of the case, the respondent authority is directed to decide the petitioner's representation regarding grant of Assured Career Progression (A.C.P.), group insurance and other benefits in accordance with law within a period of three months from receipt of a certified copy of the order along with a fresh copy of the representation.

¶11

Ratio / Principle

The writ petition was finally disposed of with the aforesaid direction, the order having been issued expressly without going into the merits of the case.

¶11

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

Post-retiral benefits - time-bound disposal of representation. Petitioner, who retired in 2023 as an employee of the Health Department, U.P. at Kanpur Nagar Nigam, complained that her entitlements including Assured Career Progression (A.C.P.) benefits, group insurance and arrears had not been disbursed and that her representation had gone unheeded. In WRIT - A No. 6153 of 2025, Hon'ble Ajay Bhanot, J. (order dated 7.5.2025), without going into the merits of the case, finally disposed of the writ petition by directing the respondent authority to decide the representation regarding grant of A.C.P., group insurance and other benefits in accordance with law within a period of three months from receipt of a certified copy of the order along with a fresh copy of the representation. Neutral Citation: 2025:AHC:73315.

Smt Keshar v. State of U.P. and 2 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Smt Keshar v. State of U.P. and 2 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Charanpal Singh vs State of U.P. and 2 Others

Sindhu Devi vs the Principal Secretary and Rahat Ayukt Government of Up and 3 Others

Ranjeet Saini vs the State of U.P. and 2 Others

Umesh Singh vs Food Corporation of India and 5 Others

Kamlesh Yadav vs Food Corporation of India Divisional Office and 5 Others

Rajeev Kumar Yadav and 2 Others vs State of U.P. and 3 Others