The writ petition was dismissed for want of prosecution as the petitioner was absent to present their case.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW
WRIT - A No. - 6004 of 2014
| Arun Kumar Pandey | Versus .....Petitioner(s) |
|
|---|---|---|
| State Of U.P. Through Prin. Bodies Lko |
Secy. | Deptt. Of Local .....Respondent(s) |
| Counsel for Petitioner(s) Counsel for Respondent(s) |
: : |
Anil Kumar Rajvanshi, Sanjeev Pandey C.S.C., Avinash Pandey |
Court No. - 18
HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J.
(Shree Prakash Singh,J.)
December 10, 2025
Mayank
Digitally signed by :- MAYANK PRATAP SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Arun Kumar Pandey
State Of U.P.
Shree Prakash Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
