Writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India was dismissed for want of prosecution as the petitioner was absent from the proceeding.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW
WRIT - A No. - 193 of 2020
Krishna Shanker Tiwari
.....Petitioner(s)
Versus
| State Of U.P.Thru Secy.Secondary And Ors. |
Education Lko .....Respondent(s) |
|---|---|
| Counsel for Petitioner(s) : |
Sanjay Misra, Anil Kumar Shukla |
| Counsel for Respondent(s) : |
C.S.C., R.K.S.Suryvanshi |
Court No. - 18
HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J.
(Shree Prakash Singh,J.)
December 10, 2025
AKS
Digitally signed by :- ANUJ KRISHNA SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Krishna Shanker Tiwari
State Of U.P. Thru Secy. Secondary
Shree Prakash Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
