None appeared for the petitioner in Writ-A No. 4628 of 2005. The petition was dismissed for want of prosecution and any interim order stood discharged.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW
WRIT - A No. - 4628 of 2005
Smt.Veena Mathpal Tiwari
.....Petitioner(s)
Versus
State Of U.P.Thru Prin.Secy.Medical Deptt.Lko.And 5 Others
.....Respondent(s)
Counsel for Petitioner(s) : S.K.Upadhyay Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., C.B.Pandey, Dipak Seth
Court No. - 25
HON'BLE AMITABH KUMAR RAI, J.
Case called out in the revised list.
None appeared on behalf of the petitioner to press this petition.
Learned counsel for the State is present.
Accordingly, the instant petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Interim order, if any, stands discharged.
October 16, 2025 Mahesh
(Amitabh Kumar Rai,J.)
Digitally signed by :- MAHESH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Veena Mathpal Tiwari
State Of U.P.
Amitabh Kumar Rai
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
