Writ petition by a petitioner against Uptron India Ltd.; none appeared to press the petition, and it was dismissed for want of prosecution, with interim orders discharged.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW
WRIT - A No. - 4158 of 2004
Mrs. Kahkashan Siddiqui
.....Petitioner(s)
Versus
Uptron India Ltd. Through Its M.D. And 2 Or.S
.....Respondent(s)
Counsel for Petitioner(s) : K. Bajpai, D. Bajpai Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C.
Court No. - 25
HON'BLE AMITABH KUMAR RAI, J.
Case called out in the revised list.
None appeared on behalf of the petitioner to press this petition.
Learned counsel for the State is present.
Accordingly, the instant petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Interim order, if any, stands discharged.
October 16, 2025 Mahesh
(Amitabh Kumar Rai,J.)
Digitally signed by :- MAHESH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Mrs. Kahkashan Siddiqui
Uptron India Ltd. Through Its M.D.
Amitabh Kumar Rai
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
