met with the rejection giving rise to O.A. No.332/00234 of 2024. On exchange of the affidavits, it was found that the aspects, on which the representation of the employee was directed to be considered, were not addressed by the competent authority, particularly the ground, regarding which, a protection was available to him as per the Office Memorandum dated 08.10.2018. The order passed by the competent authority was, therefore, set aside. It is this judgment/ order passed by the learned Tribunal against which the Union of India has preferred the writ petition. On a careful consideration of the impugned judgment/ order passed by the Tribunal, it is found that the Tribunal has proceeded to set aside the order, whereby the representation was rejected on a specific ground of failure on the part of competent authority to consider and deal with the grounds urged in the representation, particularly the ground of the ailment of his son, who is suffering from cerebral palsy and epilepsy disease. This ground admittedly was not addressed by the competent authority. Therefore, the finding recorded by the learned Tribunal on such an issue,
