This petition sought payment of salary and arrears regarding instatement orders. The High Court disposed of it by ordering a fresh hearing after three weeks due to a pending special appeal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 7
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 2874 of 2025
Petitioner :- Rakesh And 13 Others Respondent :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Petitioner :- Anjum Vishakarma,Sharad Chand Rai Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Shashi Prakash Singh
Hon'ble Prakash Padia,J.
Order Date :- 6.3.2025 saqlain
Digitally signed by :- SYED MOHAMMAD SAQLAIN HAIDER High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the petitioner is entitled to salary and arrears from the date they worked as Head Master/Head Mistress.
Whether the special appeal filed against the relied-upon judgment impacts the instant petition.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Writ A No.18228 of 2022 (Tripurari Dubey and another Vs. State of U.P. and others)Referred¶6
Rakesh And 13 Others
State of U.P.
District Basic Education Officer, District Azamgarh
Prakash Padia
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
