Razia Rashid v. State of U.P. and 2 Others
Case brief
What is this about?
Compassionate appointment; writ petition disposed of with direction to consider application in accordance with law in light of Supreme Court judgments Canara Bank vs. Ajithkumar G.K. (2025 INSC 184) and Tinku vs. State of Haryana and others (2024 INSC 867); communication of any legal impediment within short period; Razia Rashid v. State of U.P.; Allahabad High Court; Neutral Citation 2025:AHC:31301; decided 5.3.2025; single judge Saurabh Shyam Shamshery, J.
What did the court decide?
Direction that the petitioner's application for compassionate appointment, if filed in proper format along with factual and legal issues, be considered in accordance with law after taking note of the Supreme Court judgments in Canara Bank and Tinku; any legal impediment found by the respondent to be communicated to the petitioner within a short period.