Writ petition dismissed for want of prosecution as no one appeared for the petitioner; interim order, if any, stood vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 5
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 1984 of 2022
Petitioner :- Sandeep Kumar Respondent :- State Of U.P Thru. Its Prin. Secy. Basic Education Govt. Of U.P And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Manuvendra Singh,Anand Mani Tripathi,Durga Prasad Shukla,Himanshu Raghave Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Ran Vijay Singh,Rishabh Tripathi,Shobhit Mohan Shukla
Hon'ble Abdul Moin,J.
1. List revised.
2. None appears on behalf of the petitioner to press the petition. However, learned Standing Counsel is present on behalf of the State.
3. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed for want of prosecution .
4. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
[Abdul Moin, J.]
Order Date :- 24.7.2025 cks/-
Digitally signed by :- CHANDRA KANT SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Sandeep Kumar
State Of U.P Thru. Its Prin. Secy. Basic Education Govt. Of U.P
Abdul Moin
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
