The Allahabad High Court dismissed a writ petition seeking financial approval for a Class III appointment. Relying on prior precedent, the court held that appointments without prior approval are vitiated in law and no interference is warranted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:42252
Court No. - 5
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 16639 of 2019
Petitioner :- Praveen Kumar Shukla
Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru.Secy. Secondary Education And Ors.
Counsel for Petitioner :- Arun Kumar,Ram Raj Ojha,Shobhit Mohan Shukla
Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Abdul Moin,J.
Order Date :- 23.7.2025
A. Katiyar
Digitally signed by :- AMIT KATIYAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a writ petition for financial approval of an appointment without prior competent authority approval should be allowed.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Deepak Kumar Singh vs. State of U.P. and othersReferred¶11
W.P. No.932 (SS) of 2012
Praveen Kumar Shukla
State Of U.P.
Abdul Moin
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
