Mukesh Kumar v. State of U.P. and 2 Others
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner alleged non-compliance with an earlier writ order directing the District Basic Education Officer, Etah to decide his representation within two months. No decision taken after two years. Court directed the officer to appear in person on the next date and listed the matter for 03.12.2025.
What the court decided
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
WRIT - A No. - 17746 of 2025
Mukesh Kumar
.....Petitioner(s)
| Versus | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| State Of U.P. And 2 Others | ..... | Respondent(s) | ||
| Counsel for Petitioner(s) | : Sanjay |
Kumar Sri | vastava | |
| Counsel for Respondent(s) | : Bhanu C.S.C. |
Pratap | Singh | Kachhawah, |
Court No. - 2
HON'BLE PRAKASH PADIA, J.
- The petitioner earlier approached this Court by filing Writ A No.16476 of 2023 which was finally disposed of by a co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide its judgement and order dated 03.10.2023. The operative portion of the aforesaid order reads as follows:-
10. In view of the aforesaid reasons, this writ petition is finally disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to submit a fresh representation before the District Basic Education Officer, Etah within fifteen days from today and if such representation is filed, Respondent No. 3 shall consider and decide the said representation strictly in light of the judgment and order dated 2.8.2023 rendered by this court in Writ-A No.6719 of 2023 (Praveen Kumar vs. State of U.P. and others) within two months thereafter.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Mukesh Kumar
- respondent
State Of U.P.
Coram
Prakash Padia
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · November
- Registered
- Case no.
- WRIA/17746/2025
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court