This order granted two weeks' time to the respondents for instructions and listed the writ petition as a fresh case.
Two weeks' time to respondents prayed for and granted; petition put up as fresh after two weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
WRIT - A No. - 17338 of 2025
Smt. Bindu Prabha
.....Petitioner(s)
Versus State Of U.P. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Shashi Kant Upadhyay, Vinay Bhushan Upadhyay Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Shruti Malviya Court No. - 2
HON'BLE PRAKASH PADIA, J.
(Prakash Padia,J.)
November 26, 2025
Anurag/-
Digitally signed by :- ANURAG JAISWAL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Smt. Bindu Prabha
State Of U.P.
Prakash Padia
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
