Amitabh Srivastava v. State of U.P. Thru. Its Prin. Secy. Secondary Edu. Govt. of U.P. Lko. and 6 Others
Case brief
What is this about?
Amitabh Srivastava v. State of U.P. Thru. Its Prin. Secy. Secondary Edu. Govt. Of U.P. Lko. And 6 Others, WRIT - A No. 146 of 2024, Allahabad High Court (Lucknow Bench), Coram: Shree Prakash Singh, J., decided December 16, 2025. Writ petition dismissed as infructuous on the submission of petitioner's counsel (Ajay Pratap Singh); State counsel (C.S.C., Rishabh Tripathi) raised no objection; interim order, if any, vacated. Keywords: infructuous writ petition, dismissal, vacation of interim order, secondary education, Uttar Pradesh, consigned to record.
What did the court decide?
The writ petition is dismissed as infructuous in view of the submission of learned counsel for the petitioner that the petition had become infructuous, to which the State raised no objection. ¶12