Ramu Yadav v. State of U.P. and 3 Others
Case brief
What is this about?
Chaukidar appointment claim; enforceable right to appointment; absence of valid recruitment process; advertising of vacancies; public recruitment process; State of U.P.; writ petition dismissed. Neutral Citation No. 2025:AHC:16645; WRIT - A No. 1437 of 2025; Court No. 5; judge Ajay Bhanot; counsel Manoj Kumar Singh (petitioner), C.S.C. / learned Standing Counsel (respondents); order dated 5.2.2025.
What did the court decide?
The petitioner is not able to demonstrate any enforceable right to appointment to the post of Chaukidar in the absence of any valid recruitment process, and on that ground the writ petition is dismissed. ¶9