Disposed¶16

Dileep Shah v. State of U.P. and 5 Others

Allahabad HC1 Sept 2025WRIA/12881/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Dileep Shah v. State Of U.P. And 5 Others; High Court of Judicature at Allahabad; WRIT - A No. - 12881 of 2025; Court No. 32; Chandra Dhari Singh, J.; decision date September 1, 2025; counsel Girish Malviya, Chandra Shukla, Utkarsh (petitioner), C.S.C. (respondents); interim order - matter requires consideration, notice need not be issued, counter affidavit within four weeks, rejoinder within two weeks, case listed 11.11.2025.

What did the court decide?

Interim first-hearing order: matter admitted for consideration; issuance of notice dispensed with as Standing Counsel accepted notice for respondents 1 to 6; four weeks allowed for counter affidavit; rejoinder permitted within two weeks thereafter; case listed on 11.11.2025. No substantive relief granted or denied at this stage. ¶16

Dileep Shah vs State of U.P. and 5 Others — Allahabad HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

¶2

WRIT - A No. - 12881 of 2025

Dileep Shah

.....Petitioner(s)

Versus

State Of U.P. And 5 Others

¶7

.....Respondent(s)

¶8

Counsel for Petitioner(s)	: Girish Malviya	Chandra	Shukla,	Utkarsh
Counsel for Respondent(s)	: C.S.C.
Court No.- 32

¶9

HON'BLE CHANDRA DHARI SINGH, J.

¶10

Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, perused the contents made in the writ petition and documents on record.

¶11

Taking into consideration of the submissions and contents made in the writ petition, I am of the view that matter requires consideration.

¶12

Learned Standing Counsel appeared, in advance accepted notice, on behalf of all the respondents i.e. respondent nos.1 to 6 hence notice need not be issued.

¶13