The petitioner sought inclusion in the recruitment process for Assistant Prosecuting Officer. Upon a preliminary objection regarding maintainability, the petitioner withdrew the petition with liberty to file afresh.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW
WRIT - A No. - 12405 of 2025
Mohit Kishor Awasthi
.....Petitioner(s)
Versus
State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secretary , Appointment , Civil Secretariat , Lucknow And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : In Person Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Raj Kumar Upadhyaya (R.K.Upadhyaya)
Court No. - 7
HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J.
October 16, 2025
prabhat
(Manish Mathur,J.)
Digitally signed by :- PRABHAT KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition challenging recruitment for Assistant Prosecuting Officer was maintainable without challenging the advertisement or reservation order?
Mohit Kishor Awasthi
State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secretary , Appointment , Civil Secretariat , Lucknow And 3 Others
Manish Mathur
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
