Disposed¶11

Jagjiwan Ram Tiwari v. State of U.P. Thru. Secy. Revenue Lko. and 3 Others

Allahabad HC22 Sept 2025WRIA/11156/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Article 226 writ petition, WRIT - A No. 11156 of 2025, Allahabad High Court Lucknow Bench, Manish Mathur J., September 22 2025; pay revision exercise; trained scale; selection grade; promotional pay; arrears of salary; interest; fresh representation; District Magistrate Pratapgarh; eight weeks; reasoned and speaking order; petition finally disposed of.

What did the court decide?

Liberty to file a fresh representation before opposite party no. 3, District Magistrate, Pratapgarh, with a direction that it be decided expeditiously by a reasoned and speaking order within eight weeks of receipt (along with certified copy of the order); the writ petition stands finally disposed of. ¶11

Jagjiwan Ram Tiwari Vs State of U.P. Thru. Secy… — Writ and Judicial Review | Allahabad HC (2025)

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

¶11

Issue for consideration

Whether the authorities should be directed to carry out the pay revision exercise and ensure admissibility of the trained scale, selection grade and promotional pay to the petitioner from the date he completed his training, together with arrears of salary and interest thereon.

¶9

Court's answer

Considering that the petitioner's grievance would entail factual aspects, the Court granted liberty to the petitioner to file a fresh representation before opposite party no. 3, i.e. the District Magistrate, Pratapgarh.

¶10

Ratio / Principle

If such a representation is filed, the authority concerned is required to decide it expeditiously by a reasoned and speaking order within a period of eight weeks from receipt of the representation of the petitioner along with a certified copy of the order.

¶10

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

Writ-A No. 11156 of 2025 (High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench; Hon'ble Manish Mathur, J.; decided September 22, 2025): Petitioner Jagjiwan Ram Tiwari, by a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, sought a direction for carrying out the pay revision exercise and ensuring admissibility of the trained scale, selection grade and promotional pay from the date he completed his training, together with salary arrears and interest. Holding that the grievance entailed factual aspects, the Court granted liberty to file a fresh representation before opposite party no. 3, the District Magistrate, Pratapgarh, directing that it be decided expeditiously by a reasoned and speaking order within eight weeks of receipt, along with a certified copy of the order; with these directions the petition stood finally disposed of.

Jagjiwan Ram Tiwari v. State of U.P. Thru. Secy. Revenue Lko. and 3 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Jagjiwan Ram Tiwari v. State of U.P. Thru. Secy. Revenue Lko. and 3 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Ram Kishor Vs State of U.P. Thru. Secy. Forest Deptt. Lko. and Another

Surendra Kumar Srivastava Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. of Minor Irrigation and Ground Water , Lucknow and Others

Ravi Kumar Nag Vs State of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Tax and Registration Lko. and 4 Others

Anju Lata Gupta vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Social Welfare Deptt. Lko. and 6 Others

Jiya Lal and Another vs the State of U.P. Thru. the Prin. Secy. Dept. of Rural Development Lko. and 3 Others

Smt. Priti Saroj vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Bal Vikas Ewam Pustahar Lko. and 4 Others