Furkan Khan v. State of U.P. Thru.the Prin. Secy. Panchayati Raj U.P. Lko. and 7 Others
Case brief
What is this about?
Keywords: PIL dismissed for want of prosecution; non-appearance of petitioner; revised list call-out; no adjournment sought. Parties: Furkan Khan v. State of U.P. through Principal Secretary, Panchayati Raj, Lucknow and 7 others. Forum: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench, Court No. 1; coram Attau Rahman Masoodi, J. and Ajai Kumar Srivastava-I, J.; order dated 16.5.2025. Counsel: Vidya Kant Sharma (petitioner); C.S.C. and Mohan Singh (respondents). No statute, precedent, quantum, or substantive ruling appears; the order is useful only as a record of a procedural dismissal and is not citable for any point of law.
What did the court decide?
The writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution because none appeared for the petitioner to press the petition when the case was called out in the revised list, and no request for adjournment or passing over was made.