Megh Singh v. State of U.P. and 5 Others
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner alleged that an application under the U.P. Revenue Court Manual for implementation of an order had not been registered by the Assistant Collector. The court directed the State to obtain instructions within two weeks and scheduled a further hearing.
What the court decided
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. - 3834 of 2025
Megh Singh
.....Petitioner(s)
Versus
State Of U.P. And 5 Others
| .....Resp | ondent(s) | |
|---|---|---|
| Counsel for Petitioner(s) | : Girish Chandra Maurya, Abhishek |
Kunwar |
| Counsel for Respondent(s) | : Arun Kumar Pandey, C.S.C. |
|
| Court No.- 55 |
HON'BLE CHANDRA KUMAR RAI, J.
- Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the application under Section 460 of U.P. Revenue Court Manual has been filed before the Assistant Collector for implementation of the order but the proceeding has not been registered.
- Mr. T.P. Gupta, learned Standing Counsel for the State shall obtain instruction in the matter within two weeks.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Megh Singh
- respondent
State Of U.P.
- respondent
5 Others
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · December
- Registered
- Case no.
- WPIL/3834/2025
All orders in this case
5 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court