Jayshankar Singh v. State of U.P. and 6 Others
Case brief
What is this about?
The order is an interim listing direction granting time to the standing counsel. It does not dispose of the matter or decide any substantive issue.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
WRIT - C No. - 42959 of 2025
Jayshankar Singh
.....Petitioner(s)
Versus
| State Of U.P. And 6 Others | .. | ...Respondent(s) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Counsel for Petitioner(s) | : Byas Gupta |
Kumar Prasad, | Pankaj Kumar |
| Counsel for Respondent(s) | : C.S.C. |
||
| Court No.- 9 |
HON'BLE ARUN KUMAR, J.
- Heard Shri Pankaj Kumar Gupta, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for respondent nos.1 to 7.
- The present petition has been filed challenging the order of respondent no.3/District Panchayat Raj Officer, Chandauli dated 11.11.2025 pursuant to which the petitioner has been directed to pay a sum of Rs.2,85,880/- in the Gram Nidhi account within a week.
- It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that the order dated 11.11.2025 has been passed behind the back of the petitioner, no inquiry regarding the misappropriation of funds had been held. He had not been afforded any notice or opportunity before passing the aforesaid order. The recovery proceedings contemplated against the petitioner is neither under Section 27 of the U.P. Panchayat Raj Act, 1947 nor under the MGNREGA Scheme.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Jayshankar Singh
- respondent
State Of U.P.
Coram
Arun Kumar
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · December
- Registered
- Case no.
- WRIC/42959/2025
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
M/S Gandiv Hindi Dainik, Nichibag and 2 Others vs Labour Commissioner / Assistant Labour Commissioner / Authorized Controller, and Another
Umesh Chandra vs State of U.P. and 5 Others
Smt. Rinki Singh vs State of U.P. and 4 Others
Uma Shanker Yadav and 5 Others vs the General Manager, Howrah Mills Company Limited and Another