Ramgopal v. State of U.P. and 8 Others
Case brief
What is this about?
This order does not decide the matter. It is a procedural directions order listing the case for further hearing.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. - 3796 of 2025
Ramgopal
.....Petitioner(s)
Versus
State Of U.P. And 8 Others
.....Respondent(s)
| Counsel for Petitioner(s) | : Dinesh Kumar Singh |
|---|---|
| Counsel for Respondent(s) | : Avinash Chandra Srivastava, C.S.C. |
Court No. - 55
HON'BLE CHANDRA KUMAR RAI, J.
- Heard Mr. Dinesh Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Rajesh Kumar Tiwari, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State-respondents.
- Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the private respondents are in illegal possession over the plots in question.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Ramgopal
- respondent
State Of U.P. And 8 Others
Coram
Chandra Kumar Rai
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · December
- Registered
- Case no.
- WPIL/3796/2025
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court