Hemendra Singh v. State of U.P. and 6 Others
Case brief
What is this about?
Interlocutory order directing counsel for the State and Gram Sabha to obtain instructions within two weeks. No substantive decision on merits.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. - 3547 of 2025
Hemendra Singh
.....Petitioner(s)
Versus
State Of U.P. And 6 Others
| Counsel for Petitioner(s) | : Jay Prakash Singh .....Respondent(s) |
|---|---|
| Counsel for Respondent(s) | : C.S.C., Krishna Kant Singh |
Court No. - 55
HON'BLE CHANDRA KUMAR RAI, J.
1.In view of the prayer made in the instant public interest litigation, instruction is required from the State and Gram Sabha.
- Mr. Anil Kumar Yadav, learned Standing counsel for the Staterespondents and Mr. Krishna Kant Singh, learned Counsel for the Gram Sabha shall obtain instruction within two weeks.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Hemendra Singh
- respondent
State Of U.P.
- respondent
Gram Sabha
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · November
- Registered
- Case no.
- WPIL/3547/2025
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court