Amar v. State of U.P. and 7 Others
Case brief
What is this about?
A public interest litigation seeking instructions from the State. The Court directed the Standing Counsel to obtain instructions within two weeks and listed the matter fresh for further hearing.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. - 3545 of 2025
Amar
.....Petitioner(s)
Versus
State Of U.P. And 7 Others
| Counsel for Petitioner(s) | : Varsha Singh .....Respondent(s) |
|---|---|
| Counsel for Respondent(s) | : C.S.C. |
Court No. - 55
HON'BLE CHANDRA KUMAR RAI, J.
1.In view of the prayer made in the instant public interest litigation, instruction is required from the State.
- Mr. Satyendra Bhushan Dubey, learned Standing counsel for the Staterespondents shall obtain instruction within two weeks.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Amar
- respondent
State Of U.P.
- respondent
7 Others
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · November
- Registered
- Case no.
- WPIL/3545/2025
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court