PIL seeking removal of encroachment on village Chak Marg land in Sitapur. State claimed offending constructions were removed; petitioner disputed this. Court disposed of the petition, permitting petitioner to file an application under Section 67 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:10467
Court No. - 7
Case :- PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. - 137 of 2025
Petitioner :- Bamdev Singh Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Collector Sitapur And 7 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Abhishek Pandey,Krishna Dutt Tripathi Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Dilip Kumar Pandey
Hon'ble Pankaj Bhatia,J.
"(i) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding the opposite parties more specifically opposite parties No.1 to 3 to take necessary action against the opposite parties Nos.5 to 8 to get removed the illegal encroachment, made by him over the land of Gata No.724/0.0410 situated in Village- Ismail Ganj, Paragana- Godlamau, Tehsil- Sidhauli, District- Sitapur, who is recorded as village main Chak Marg land in revenue record."
Order Date :- 18.2.2025 Ashutosh
Digitally signed by :- ASHUTOSH PANDEY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the court should direct removal of alleged encroachment on village Chak Marg land (Gata No.724) in Sitapur.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Bamdev Singh
State Of U.P. Thru. Collector Sitapur
Dilip Kumar Pandey
Pankaj Bhatia
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
