Sheelu Srivastava v. Arun Kumar Srivastava
Case brief
What is this about?
Application to transfer a divorce petition from the principal judge family court at Bahraich to the principal judge family court at Gorakhpur, alleging conduct to harass the applicant.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW
TRANSFER APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 288 of 2025
Sheelu Srivastava
.....Applicant(s)
Versus
| Arun Kumar Srivastava | .....Opposite Party(s) |
|---|---|
| Counsel for Applicant(s) | : Varsha Agarwal, Ashish Kumar Tiwari |
| Counsel for Opposite Party(s) | : |
Court No. - 20
HON'BLE SYED QAMAR HASAN RIZVI, J.
- Heard Shri Rajeev Kumar Srivastava, learned counsel for applicant and perused the material available on record.
- By means of the present transfer application, the applicant has prayed for transfer of Divorce Petition No. 706 of 2025, under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act (Arun Kumar Vs. Sheelu Srivastava) pending in the court of learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Bahraich to the court of equivalent jurisdiction at Principal Judge, Family Court, Gorakhpur.
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the conditions for transfer of the divorce petition under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act from Bahraich to Gorakhpur are satisfied based on matrimonial ties and residence.
Whether the filing of the divorce in Bahraich was done for the purpose of harassment.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Sheelu Srivastava
- respondent
Arun Kumar Srivastava
Coram
Syed Qamar Hasan Rizvi
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · November
- Registered
- Case no.
- TACL/288/2025
All orders in this case
4 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court