Smt. Monika Nandan v. State of U.P. and Another
Case brief
What is this about?
Transfer application under Section 24 CPC seeking to move a Hindu Marriage Act divorce case from Family Court Unnao to Prayagraj, where the applicant-wife resides and works. Court issued notice to opposite party No. 2 both ways, directed service steps within seven working days, and listed for December 2025.
What the court decided
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW
TRANSFER APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 284 of 2025
Smt. Monika Nandan
.....Applicant(s)
Versus State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s) Counsel for Applicant(s) : Dhiraj Chaurasiya, Gajendra Yadav Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : C.S.C.
Court No. - 20
HON'BLE SYED QAMAR HASAN RIZVI, J.
- Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of the State of U.P.
- By means of this application filed under Section 24 of the Civil Procedure Code, the applicant has prayed for the transfer of the matrimonial Case No. 680 of 2025 (Virendra Gautam Vs. Smt. Monika Nandan) filed under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, pending in the Court of learned Additional Principal Judge, Family Court, Unnao to the Court of equivalent jurisdiction at Allahabad (now Prayagraj).
- The submission of learned counsel for the applicant is that the applicant was married to the opposite party No. 2 on 23/11/2019 and on account of disputes between the parties, the applicant has been forced to live at Prayagraj and at present, she is residing with her brother at Prayagraj. Several cases arising out of the materimonial dispute are pending in the Courts at Prayagraj. The applicant is a working lady presently employed as a Primary Teacher at Prayagraj. It is further submitted on behalf of the applicant that the opposite party No. 2 has filed the aforesaid Case No. 680 of 2025 (Virendra Gautam Vs. Smt. Monika Nandan) under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 in the Family Court at Unnao, just to harass the applicant.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the divorce suit (Case No. 680 of 2025) pending at Family Court, Unnao should be transferred to Prayagraj on account of the wife's hardship in travelling.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Smt. Monika Nandan
- respondent
State of U.P.
- respondent
Virendra Gautam
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · November
- Registered
- Case no.
- TACL/284/2025
All orders in this case
2 orders share this CNR
- Order 1 — this page · S. Q. H. Rizvi
- Order 2 · S. Q. H. Rizvi
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court