Sultan Jahan v. Mumtaz Begum
Case brief
What is this about?
Applicant sought to withdraw the transfer application, stating that due to subsequent developments it had become infructuous. The court permitted withdrawal and dismissed the application.
Applicant sought to withdraw the transfer application, stating that due to subsequent developments it had become infructuous. The court permitted withdrawal and dismissed the application.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW
TRANSFER APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 256 of 2025
| Sultan Jahan | .....Applicant(s) |
|---|---|
| Versus | |
| Mumtaz Begum | .....Opposite Party(s) |
| Counsel for Applicant(s) | : Abhishek, Sachin Upadhyay, Utkarsh Misra |
| Counsel for Opposite Party(s) | : Suresh Chandra Pandey |
| Court No.- 6 |
HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J.
Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks to withdraw the writ petition as on account of subsequent development present application has rendered infructuous.
In view thereof, present application is dismissed .
(Pankaj Bhatia,J.)
October 6, 2025
nishant
Digitally signed by :- NISHANT MOHAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Sultan Jahan
Mumtaz Begum
Pankaj Bhatia
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court