Pooja Devi v. Veer Kumar alias Veeru
Case brief
What is this about?
A transfer application (civil) was simply listed after three weeks; any interim order previously granted was extended till the next date of listing. The order decides nothing on the merits.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW
TRANSFER APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 176 of 2025
Pooja Devi
.....Applicant(s)
Versus
Veer Kumar Alias Veeru
.....Opposite Party(s)
Counsel for Applicant(s) : Rajat Pratap Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) :
Court No. - 20
HON'BLE SYED QAMAR HASAN RIZVI, J.
List after three weeks.
Interim order, if any, granted earlier is extended till the next date of listing.
(Syed Qamar Hasan Rizvi,J.)
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Pooja Devi
- respondent
Veer Kumar Alias Veeru
Coram
Syed Qamar Hasan Rizvi
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · October
- Registered
- Case no.
- TACL/176/2025
All orders in this case
2 orders share this CNR
- Order 1 · Prashant Kumar
- Order 2 — this page · Prashant Kumar
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
Mohd. Gulfam vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. of Transport Lko. and 5 Others
Mohammed Gulfam vs State of U.P. and 4 Others
Sushmita Goswami and 3 Others vs United Insurance Company Ltd. Thru. Branch Manager Dist. Ayodhya 2 Others
Smt. Malti Devi and 4 Others vs Shri Ram General Insurance Co. Ltd. Thru. Branch Manager Lko. and 2 Others