Smt. Sanjivani alias Sadhna v. Sri Narendra
Case brief
What is this about?
Transfer application (civil) could not be taken up due to paucity of time; the court adjourned the matter for three weeks and directed that any interim order shall continue till then.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW
TRANSFER APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 165 of 2025
Smt. Sanjivani Alias Sadhna
.....Applicant(s)
| Versus | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sri Narendra | ..... | Opposite Party(s) |
| Counsel for Applicant(s) Counsel for Opposite Party(s) |
: Satish Kumar Sharma, Anjali Soniya Mishra Soni Pathak : |
Dubey, |
Court No. - 6
HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J.
1. Due to paucity of time, the case could not be taken up.
2. List after three weeks.
3. Interim order, if any, shall continue till then.
(Pankaj Bhatia,J.)
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Smt. Sanjivani Alias Sadhna
- respondent
Sri Narendra
Coram
Pankaj Bhatia
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · July
- Registered
- Case no.
- TACL/165/2025
All orders in this case
2 orders share this CNR
- Order 1 — this page · S. Q. H. Rizvi
- Order 2 · S. Q. H. Rizvi
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court