Deen Dayal Varma v. State of U.P. and 4 Others
Case brief
What is this about?
Criminal appeal under Section 413 BNSS against conviction. Counsel for appellant sought adjournment on account of social obligation; the High Court adjourned the hearing and listed the matter afresh for orders.
What the court decided
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL APPEAL U/S 413 BNSS No. - 631 of 2025
Deen Dayal Varma
.....Appellant(s)
Versus
State Of U.P. And 4 Others
| ... | ..Respondent(s) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Counsel for Appellant(s) | : Gaurav Yadav |
Singh Yadav, | Rajjan Singh |
| Counsel for Respondent(s) | : G.A. |
Court No. - 47
HON'BLE RAJEEV MISRA, J. HON'BLE DR. AJAY KUMAR-II, J.
- Heard Mr. Rajjan Singh Yadav, learned counsel for appellant and the learned A.G.A. for State-opposite part-1.
- Perused the record.
- On the matter being taken up, learned counsel for appellant fairly submits that on account of social obligation he could not prepare the matter.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Deen Dayal Varma
- respondent
State Of U.P.
- respondent
4 Others
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · November
- Registered
- Case no.
- NC413/631/2025
All orders in this case
2 orders share this CNR
- Order 1 — this page · Ajay Kumar-ii Rajeev Misra
- Order 2 · Ajay Kumar-ii Rajeev Misra
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court