Disposed¶13

Faheem v. State of U.P.

Allahabad HC8 Jan 2025NABAIL/9984/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Allahabad High Court anticipatory bail under S.482 BNSS refused as not pressed; applicant directed to surrender within two weeks for regular bail to be decided expeditiously per Satender Kumar Antil v. CBI (2021 SCC OnLine SC 922); no coercive action for two weeks or till surrender; offences under Ss. 191(2), 191(3), 109, 115(2), 352, 351(3) BNS, P.S. Kotwali, Gorakhpur; disposed 9.1.2025 by Justice Deepak Verma.

What did the court decide?

Anticipatory bail relief refused (not pressed); instead, directions issued: applicant to surrender within two weeks and apply for regular bail, to be decided expeditiously per Satender Kumar Antil v. CBI, with no coercive action against him for two weeks or until surrender, whichever is earlier. ¶13

Faheem Vs State of U.P. — Anticipatory Bail | Allahabad HC (2025)

¶1

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:4411

¶2

Court No. - 70

¶3

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No. - 9984 of 2024

¶4

Applicant :- Faheem Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Kamlesh Kumar Tiwari Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶5

Hon'ble Deepak Verma,J.

¶6

Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. for the State.

¶7

The instant Anticipatory Bail Application has been filed with a prayer to grant an anticipatory bail to the applicant in Case Crime No.191 of 2024, under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 109, 115(2), 352, 351(3), B.N.S. Police Station- Kotwali, DistrictGorakhpur.

¶8

After arguing the matter at some length, learned counsel for the applicant has not pressed the relief as sought by means of this application on merit and prayed for issuance of appropriate direction to the concerned Courts below to decide the bail application of the applicant expeditiously.

¶9

Learned A.G.A. has no objection in allowing the aforesaid prayer of the applicant.

¶10

Accordingly the relief as sought by the applicant through this application is refused.

¶11

Considering the aforesaid alternative prayer of the applicant, it is directed that if applicant surrenders before the concerned Court below within two weeks from today and applies for regular bail, the bail application shall be decided expeditiously by the courts below in accordance with law laid down by the Apex Court in the case of Satender Kumar Antil Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and another, reported in 2021 SCC OnLine SC 922.

¶12

For the period of two weeks from today or till the time of surrender of the applicant before the Court below, whichever is earlier, no coercive action shall be taken against him.

¶13

With the aforesaid directions, this anticipatory bail application stands disposed of.

¶14

Order Date :- 9.1.2025 SKD

¶15

Digitally signed by :- SURJIT KUMAR DEY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Faheem v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Faheem v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases